On 14 Mar 2016, at 20:37, Katherine Richardson
<katherineh.richardson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well done Laura! :D
Been having lots of fun playing with the spreadsheet. We beat gaorsach and Thrales in
sword handling, equalling with steel. Presentation better than black swan and silver
flame. In the spotlight our stepping equalled sallyport and presentation was better than
Kingsmen. Small but affirming victories.
I think having a points guide for judges/teams would be so useful to work out where we
stand and what we can actually improve on. I really hope this committee will make a big
impact!
Kx
P.s hope everyone is feeling ok, we both have coughs and my legs are still cramp jelly
:P
On Monday, March 14, 2016, Hannah Norman
<hannahruthnorman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Turns out that Results spreadsheet is on the DERT 2016 Result page for all to download.
Nice to be able to see them all and play with the rankings. :)
> On 14 March 2016 at 20:05, Ffion Mair <ffion_coch(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> That was something that came up at the Sunday morning meeting. Steph said there is a
document that says "good sword handling includes x, bad sword handling includes
y" but it's just good and bad, no gradient and no suggested marks so one judge
can see all of the good things and award 10 points and another judge and see all the good
things and award 15. I imagine Tom's response to any post-DERT complaints will be
"that's for the new committee to decide". X
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 14 Mar 2016, at 19:55, Becky Such <rebeccasuch(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thrales are confused by the presentation results as well (for them and us!) in
both competitions.
>>
>> I've just checked the rules but, as far as I can tell, there is nothing to
explain what any of the categories actually means (including the allusive buzz).
>>
>> Ken has proposed, post AGM and all results, comments etc coming out, we could
both email Tom Besford to say a polite version of wtf were people looking for? And the
fact that we don't know why we were penalised. It might be that the comments will
explain things but it would be nice to know what they're looking for for the future
anyway.
>>
>> xx
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Tower Ravens] DERT results
>> From: ffion_coch(a)hotmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:42:37 +0000
>> To: rebeccasuch(a)hotmail.com
>> CC: team(a)towerravens.org.uk
>>
>> Definitely well done Laura on the writing and everything else. I think only 10
for presentation is nonsense though. It was by far the best female kit there! I guess
presentation is more than just kit though unfortunately. Really looking forward to reading
the judge's comments on the trad. X
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 14 Mar 2016, at 19:18, Becky Such <rebeccasuch(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This appeared on the Star and Shadow inner members page that I am privy to, I
don't know where it came from or if it's available anywhere else so apologies if
it's a dull repeat!
>>
>> What I don't think we've seen is the trad individual marks. Looking at
these I think we all need to give Laura a huge well done, we got extra points for the
effort she put into the written element and ensuring we then performed it as closely to
that notation as possible.
>>
>> WELL DONE :)
>>
>>
>> <Results.xlsx>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tower Raven's mailing list
>> team(a)towerravens.org.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Tower Raven's mailing list
team(a)towerravens.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tower Raven's mailing list
> team(a)towerravens.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Tower Raven's mailing list
team(a)towerravens.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Tower Raven's mailing list
team(a)towerravens.org.uk